The Abrahamic religions' monotheistic God is often described as being omniscient, omnipotent, and benevolent. Depending on your interpretation of these words, this may yield a contradiction: why is there so much suffering in the world? If God knows about the suffering and can fix it, but doesn't, they must not be benevolent. Perhaps they don't know about it, in which case they are not omniscient. Or perhaps they cannot fix it, in which case they are not omnipetent.
A higher perspectives yields some insight here, since it shows that omniscience implies impotence. Note that impotence here doesn't mean "can't do anything", but rather a lack of free will, where one's actions are determined. This suggests that a God meeting these three characteristics lacks the ability to choose what actions they take; since the whole paradox centers around questioning such a God's choices, the paradox is then rendered moot.
Time's arrow → also sheds some light onto the paradox. A part of receiving the gift of choice is the ability to make bad decisions. Benevolence does not necessarily mean no consequences.